Re: cvs chapters in our docs

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least
> the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS
> documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally
> backpatch things like this though, so comments on that?

The sort of people who would actually have a use for the information
are unlikely to be looking at back branches, so I don't particularly
see the point.  But if you wanna do the work ...
        regards, tom lane