Re: COPYable logs status
| От | Matthew T. O'Connor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: COPYable logs status |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4669C04C.7070003@zeut.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: COPYable logs status (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: COPYable logs status
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes: >> How about creating a log-writing-process? Postmaster could write to the >> log files directly until the log-writer is up and running, then all >> processes can send their log output through the log-writer. > > We *have* a log-writing process. The problem is in getting the data to it. By that I assume you mean the bgwriter, I thought that was for WAL data, I didn't think it could or perhaps should be used for normal log file writing, but I also know I'm way outside my comfort area in talking about this, so excuse the noise if this is way off base.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: