Re: How much ram is too much
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How much ram is too much |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4669940F.3050002@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: How much ram is too much (david@lang.hm) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
david@lang.hm wrote: >> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Dave Cramer wrote: >> >>> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other >>> systems >>> in the server bottleneck ? > > the only way 128G of ram would be too much is if your total database > size (including indexes) is smaller then this. > > now it may not gain you as much of an advantage going from 64G to 128G > as it does going from 32G to 64G, but that depends on many variables as > others have been asking. I don't know about the IBM but I know some of the HPs require slower ram to actually get to 128G. Joshua D. Drake > > David Lang > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: