Re: Question on pgbench output
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question on pgbench output |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4665.1238946412@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Question on pgbench output (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Question on pgbench output
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 16:34 -0700, David Kerr wrote:
>> 400 concurrent users doesn't mean that they're pulling 1.5 megs /
>> second every second.
> There's a world of difference between 400 connected and 400 concurrent
> users. You've been testing 400 concurrent users, yet without measuring
> data transfer. The think time will bring the number of users right down
> again, but you really need to include the much higher than normal data
> transfer into your measurements and pgbench won't help there.
Actually pgbench can simulate think time perfectly well: use its \sleep
command in your script. I think you can even set it up to randomize the
sleep time.
I agree that it seems David has been measuring a case far beyond what
his real problem is.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: