Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I think this means it is finding our /port/snprintf(), but when it calls
> vsnprintf, it must be using some other version, probably the operating
> system version that doesn't support %lld.
Ya know, I was wondering about that but dismissed it because the
routines were all declared in the same file. Windows' linker must
behave very oddly to do this.
Does it help if you flip the order of the snprintf and vsnprintf
functions in snprintf.c?
regards, tom lane