Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> Does anyone actually read these?
>> LOG: database system was shut down at 2007-05-30 17:54:39 CEST
>> LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/42C4FC
>> LOG: redo record is at 0/42C4FC; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
>> LOG: next transaction ID: 0/593; next OID: 10820
>> LOG: next MultiXactId: 1; next MultiXactOffset: 0
>> LOG: database system is ready
>
>> Why not just:
>
>> LOG: database system is ready
>
> I like the report of the previous system state (the first line).
> I agree that the four in the middle could be reduced to DEBUG1 or
> some such.
+1 from me. In case of recovery, I think one should still get the full
output, no? It might be important information then.
Best Regards
Michael Paesold