Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
>> A seasoned developer might only need the file name to guess what kind of
>> file it is, but other people could probably use the help.
>
> I think Peter's argument is that what kind of file it is really doesn't help a
> regular user. Nonetheless I agree strongly. Even if it doesn't actually make
> any practical difference it's one less thing to wonder about and one more
> anchor for a user to hold onto when trying to understand what's going on.
>
> I know I feel better knowing what part is actually broken on my car than just
> having a dummy light come on even if I'm going to go to the same garage either
> way.
In general I agree with your assessment but... In PostgreSQL everything
is structured so formally in terms of the filesystem that the verbosity
seems overkill. I mean think about it:
pg_clog/0FEa
pg_xlog/9283521535
base/124765/23569.1
It isn't really that opaque. Besides, *anybody* who gets the errors we
are talking about is going to post that they can't open the specific
file right?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/