Re: like/ilike improvements
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: like/ilike improvements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4656426A.7000304@dunslane.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: like/ilike improvements (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: like/ilike improvements
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> However, I have just about convinced myself that we don't need >> IsFirstByte for matching "_" for UTF8, either preceded by "%" or not, as >> it should always be true. Can anyone come up with a counter example? >> > > You have to be on a first byte before you can meaningfully apply > NextChar, and you have to use NextChar or else you don't count > characters correctly (eg "__" must match 2 chars not 2 bytes). > > > Yes, I agree completely. However it looks to me like IsFirstByte will in fact always be true when we get to call NextChar for matching "_" for UTF8. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: