Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...
От | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46520000.1062214659@lerlaptop.lerctr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ... ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)
("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:35:10 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> >> >> --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:19:49 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" >> <scrappy@hub.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> So be it, but I was under the impression that the fix would be >> >> committed shortly after I posted it on LAST SATURDAY, but apparently >> >> Bruce was out of town, and the Beta2 TAG was laid, WITHOUT PUBLIC >> >> NOTICE about the TAG coming. >> > >> > Beta2 TAG was laid so that we could wrap up all fixes to date, of which >> > yours for unixware hadn't been included yet ... it had been 3 weeks >> > since Beta1, there were alot of changes, and if ppl are testing based >> > on the tar ball and not straight CVS, chances are most bugs reported >> > had already been fixed ... >> > >> >> Then the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits are thrown in my face for >> >> complaining about these facts. >> > >> > This was uncalled for, but so were your comments over one patch ... >> > >> >> I want to see PostgreSQL succeed and take over the Open Source >> >> DataBase world, and want to help, but y'all are making it HARD. >> > >> > Because one patch wasn't committed before we tar'd up a new beta? >> no, because the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits keep getting thrown in my face >> everytime I ask for UnixWare specific changes. > > 'K, since flamewars are just sooooo counter-productive to the task at > hand, can we just drop this and move on? > > Larry, can you go to archives and let us know which URL contains the patch > that seems to be 'in question'? And post it in a seperate thread, so that > it doesn't get lost in this whole degraded thread? > Here is the patch as posted again (the src/template/unixware change will need minor mods for today's CVS). Index: src/port/thread.c =================================================================== RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/port/thread.c,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 thread.c --- src/port/thread.c 16 Aug 2003 15:35:51 -0000 1.4 +++ src/port/thread.c 23 Aug 2003 04:29:15 -0000 @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ pqGetpwuid(uid_t uid, struct passwd *resultbuf, char *buffer, size_t buflen, struct passwd **result) { -#if defined(USE_THREADS) && defined(NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES) +#if defined(USE_THREADS) && (defined(NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES) || defined(HAVE_GETPWUID_R)) /* * Early POSIX draft of getpwuid_r() returns 'struct passwd *'. * getpwuid_r(uid, resultbuf, buffer, buflen) Index: src/template/unixware =================================================================== RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/template/unixware,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 unixware --- src/template/unixware 16 Aug 2003 15:35:51 -0000 1.15 +++ src/template/unixware 23 Aug 2003 04:29:15 -0000 @@ -10,5 +10,5 @@ fi SUPPORTS_THREADS=yes -NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES=yes -THREAD_CFLAGS += -D_REENTRANT +#NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES=yes +THREAD_CFLAGS="$THREAD_CFLAGS -D_REENTRANT -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R" -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:
Следующее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"Дата:
Сообщение: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)