Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Larry Rosenman
Тема Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...
Дата
Msg-id 46520000.1062214659@lerlaptop.lerctr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Ответы Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers

--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:35:10 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<scrappy@hub.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:19:49 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
>> <scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> So be it, but I was under the impression that the fix would be
>> >> committed shortly after I posted it on LAST SATURDAY, but apparently
>> >> Bruce was out of town, and the Beta2 TAG was laid, WITHOUT PUBLIC
>> >> NOTICE about the TAG coming.
>> >
>> > Beta2 TAG was laid so that we could wrap up all fixes to date, of which
>> > yours for unixware hadn't been included yet ... it had been 3 weeks
>> > since Beta1, there were alot of changes, and if ppl are testing based
>> > on the tar ball and not straight CVS, chances are most bugs reported
>> > had already been fixed ...
>> >
>> >> Then the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits are thrown in my face for
>> >> complaining about these facts.
>> >
>> > This was uncalled for, but so were your comments over one patch ...
>> >
>> >> I want to see PostgreSQL succeed and take over the Open Source
>> >> DataBase world, and want to help, but y'all are making it HARD.
>> >
>> > Because one patch wasn't committed before we tar'd up a new beta?
>> no, because the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits keep getting thrown in my face
>> everytime I ask for UnixWare specific changes.
>
> 'K, since flamewars are just sooooo counter-productive to the task at
> hand, can we just drop this and move on?
>
> Larry, can you go to archives and let us know which URL contains the patch
> that seems to be 'in question'?  And post it in a seperate thread, so that
> it doesn't get lost in this whole degraded thread?
>
Here is the patch as posted again (the src/template/unixware change will
need minor
mods for today's CVS).

Index: src/port/thread.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/port/thread.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 thread.c
--- src/port/thread.c    16 Aug 2003 15:35:51 -0000    1.4
+++ src/port/thread.c    23 Aug 2003 04:29:15 -0000
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 pqGetpwuid(uid_t uid, struct passwd *resultbuf, char *buffer,
            size_t buflen, struct passwd **result)
 {
-#if defined(USE_THREADS) && defined(NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES)
+#if defined(USE_THREADS) && (defined(NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES) ||
defined(HAVE_GETPWUID_R))
     /*
      * Early POSIX draft of getpwuid_r() returns 'struct passwd *'.
      *    getpwuid_r(uid, resultbuf, buffer, buflen)
Index: src/template/unixware
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/template/unixware,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 unixware
--- src/template/unixware    16 Aug 2003 15:35:51 -0000    1.15
+++ src/template/unixware    23 Aug 2003 04:29:15 -0000
@@ -10,5 +10,5 @@
 fi

 SUPPORTS_THREADS=yes
-NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES=yes
-THREAD_CFLAGS += -D_REENTRANT
+#NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES=yes
+THREAD_CFLAGS="$THREAD_CFLAGS -D_REENTRANT -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R"



--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...
Следующее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)