Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Дата
Msg-id 465.1533955530@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": readonly 0 of 8192 bytes  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": readonly 0 of 8192 bytes
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Oooh ... but pg_class wouldn't be big enough to get a parallel
>> index rebuild during that test, would it?

> Typically not, but I don't think that we can rule it out right away.

Didn't take long to show that the relmapper issue wasn't it:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2018-08-10%2021%3A21%3A40

So we're back to square one.  Although Tomas' recent report might
give us something new to chase.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [sqlsmith] ERROR: partition missing from subplans
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": readonly 0 of 8192 bytes