Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory
| От | Hiroshi Inoue |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46432244.3020905@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: >> Robert Treat wrote: >>> It's generally a very bad idea for a BSD licensed project to include lgpl >>> licensed code > >> Psqlodbc package is LGPL licensed and seems to have little problem to >> include copy of BSD licensed code as a part of it. > > Right, that direction is fine, it's the other way around that's > problematic (because adding some BSD code adds no new restrictions on > what users can do with an overall-LGPL project, whereas having some LGPL > components in a supposedly BSD project does limit what they can do with > it). I don't see any reason why you shouldn't include those PG autoconf > macros in psqlodbc. You just need to document that they have a BSD > license, in case someone wants to use them by themselves. Yes I am in that direction. You may see some confusing words in my otherposts but they are all I once thought. Thanks for your clarification. regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: