Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory
| От | Hiroshi Inoue |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 463FF665.3000505@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: >> Could someone confirm the following my recognition ? > >> The LPGL package could add and release a copy of some Postgres BSD >> licensed code as LGPL ones together with the current LGPL code and >> then the package is still entirely LGPL. > > No, the files you borrowed from Postgres remain BSD --- you cannot > unilaterally relicense someone else's code. Oops I've completely misunderstood it. Probably I misread some articles about the coexistence. Many thanks. > This does not actually affect anything, since the BSD license terms are > more liberal than LGPL: you can distribute the combined package just as > easily as if it were all-LGPL, and anyone using the package is still > effectively bound by the LGPL terms for the useful parts. But it would > be appropriate to note that "files X,Y,Z are distributed under a > different license, namely <insert PG terms here>". Thanks for your clear explanation. regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: