Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>> Maybe it's BSD which is different from the license of psqlodbc (LGPL).
>> Is there no problem with their coexistence ?
>> Or is it possible for psqlodbc to be LGPL entirely ?
>>
>>
>
> I am having difficulty in understanding what the problem is. My
> understanding is that using BSD licensed code is ok in an LGPL project,
> but (probably) not vice versa.
To my knowledge you can do it either way, as long as you remember that
any changes to the lgpl code have to be released.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>