Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
>> Get rid of gborg and let's talk.
>
> Touche'.
>
> Actually, AFAICT, the only active thing left on GBorg is WWW. If we move
> that, we can shut it down. Any objections?
This should be a different thread *but* to my knowledge there is more
than WWW active on Gborg. Or at least there is some data that people
still wished moved.
Gborg needs to be shutdown in a scheduled manner. I proposed a schedule
last year but it was largely overlooked:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-08/msg01167.php
My rather bold attempt to reach all people associated with Gborg was not
met with positive responses either (granted due to a mistake on my end).
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/joshua/index.php?/archives/15-Blacklisting-PostgreSQL.Org,-Spam-and-hordes-of-geeks-Oh-My!.html
>
>> Why am I having to spend hours in Syndey saying the same thing? Why
>> don't you guys go ahead and change things, and when they fail, I will
>> still be around.
>
> You're acting as a majority of one, here, Bruce. The reason why any solution
> anyone else tries *will* fail is because you will refuse to participate in
> it. That's why people are trying to persuade you instead of just going ahead
> and doing it; you have the power to effectively sandbag anything anyone else
> does, so that's why nobody wants to put effort into it if you're opposed.
That pretty much sums it up. Bruce you can either come to the party with
a smile or a grin. It is your party. If you come with a smile everyone
will be a lot happier.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/