Re: Feature freeze progress report

Naz Gassiep wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>   
>> Naz Gassiep wrote:
>>     
>>> I believe the suggestion was to have an automated process that only ran
>>> on known, sane patches.
>>>       
>> How do we know in advance of reviewing them that they are sane?
>>     
> Same way as happens now. 
>   

The question was rhetorical ... there is no list of "certified sane but 
unapplied" patches. You are proceeding on the basis of a faulty 
understanding of how our processes work.

cheers

andrew