Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> writes:
> Grr, right after sending this I found the thread you were talking about.
> I'm not really sure our missing is better than just letting the error
> bubble up. If folks think that's better then lets just rip missing out
> entirely.
Well, that's what I was suggesting in the other thread, but it wasn't
drawing consensus.
Don't know if you noticed, but I committed your earlier patch a few
hours ago. We can revert it if we somehow get to a consensus that
we don't need "missing".
regards, tom lane