Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> This makes life difficult for packagers who need to re-run aclocal
>>> (in my case, because Red Hat ships a different automake version than
>>> you guys are using). I believe it's also a violation of the LGPL.
>
>> Hmm, thats how Peter designed it for us so we didn't have to have our
>> own copies of all the PG macros iirc. I don't have enough autoconf foo
>> to know how best to fix it though. Peter?
>
> Hm, so you're pulling those macros directly from the underlying Postgres
> installation? I didn't think they got installed anywhere --- I could do
> the same if they are, but not if running aclocal requires access to a
> Postgres source tree.
No, it's built in a pre-configured source tree under src/interfaces. See
http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/psqlodbc/psqlodbc/docs/unix-compilation.html?rev=1.4
- the 'Building a distribution' section is the set of instructions that
Peter wrote.
Regards, Dave.