Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?

Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paweł Gruszczyński
Тема Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?
Дата
Msg-id 462F59EE.2040801@inea.com.pl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Paweł Gruszczyński)
Ответы Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Greg Smith)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения
What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Paweł Gruszczyński, )
 Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Heikki Linnakangas, )
  Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Dave Cramer, )
 Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Paweł Gruszczyński, )
  Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Greg Smith, )
 Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Chris Browne, )
 Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Jim Nasby, )
  Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Cosimo Streppone, )
 Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  ("Luke Lonergan", )
 Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?  (Jim Nasby, )
Alexander Staubo napisał(a):
> On 4/25/07, Paweł Gruszczyński <> wrote:
>> I have strange situation. I`m testing performance of PostgreSQL database
>> at  different filesystems (ext2,ex3,jfs) and I cant say that JFS is as
>> much faster as it is said.
>
> I don't know about 40-60% faster, but JFS is known to be a fast, good
> file system -- faster than other file systems for some things, slower
> for others. It's particularly known for putting a somewhat lower load
> on the CPU than most other journaling file systems.
>
> Alexander.
>
I was just reading some informations on the web (for example:
http://www.nabble.com/a-comparison-of-ext3,-jfs,-and-xfs-on-hardware-raid-t144738.html).

My test should tell mi if it`s true, but now I see that rather everyhing
is ok with my test method and the gain of using JFS is not so high.

Pawel

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chris Browne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?