Re: Wild idea: 9.0?

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Between major 
> improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to 
> implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to 
> more-or-less stick to deadlines ...
> 
> ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?  
> 
> Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a 
> warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful.  And that some 
> of our more radical features in the new version could have some rough edges.
> 
> Of course, that does put is closer to 10.0 which is going to break a lot of 
> packager's scripts. ;-)
> 
> Thoughts?

I like 8.3 better personally.