Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Alexey Klyukin wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>> But if you have a checked out tree, does it work to do an update after
>>>> the tree has been regenerated? As far as I know, the repo is generated
>>>> completely every few hours, so it wouldn't surprise me that the checked
>>>> out copy is not compatible with the new repo.
>>>>
>>>> I admit I haven't tried.
>>>>
>>> I have tried and svn up worked without issues.
>>
>> As a note we will be updating this to subversion 1.4 shortly so people
>> can do svnsync too.
>
> Do I read this correctly as "This repository will stay around for a while,
> and isn't just an experiment that might be stopped tomorrow?". If so, I'll
> try using it - and lots of thanks for providing that
The subversion repository has been around *a long* time. The only thing
that is relatively new is the anonymous checkout and that is just
because we were lazy.
So yes, you can use it :)
Joshua D. Drake
>
> greetings, Florian Pflug
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/