Re: scalablility problem
От
Xiaoning Ding
Тема
Re: scalablility problem
Дата
Msg-id
460E9589.6070103@cse.ohio-state.edu
Ответ на
Re: scalablility problem (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: scalablility problem Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Re: scalablility problem Xiaoning Ding <dingxn@cse.ohio-state.edu>
Re: scalablility problem Guido Neitzer <lists@event-s.net>
Re: scalablility problem Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Re: scalablility problem Xiaoning Ding <dingxn@cse.ohio-state.edu>
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" writes: >>> I use RHEL 4. I can not understand how the scalability related with >>> shared memory? > >> It isn't RHEL4 and shared memory. It is PostgreSQL and shared memory. >> Things have changed with PostgreSQL since 7.3 (7.3 is really god awful >> old) that allow it to more effectively access shared memory and thus >> provide better performance. > > Some specifics: > > * bufmgr algorithms redesigned to allow larger number of shared buffers > to be used effectively > > * bufmgr redesigned to not have a single lock for management of all > shared buffers; likewise for lockmgr > > * lots of marginal tweaks such as paying attention to cache line > alignment of "hot" shared data structures > > I'm probably forgetting some things but I think the bufmgr and lockmgr > changes were the biggest improvements in this area. > > regards, tom lane That is very helpful. Thanks! Xiaoning > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Andrew - Supernews
Дата: