Re: notification payloads

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> So, before an investment of any more time is made by either Abhijit or 
> myself, I would like to get confirmation that a) there is broad 
> agreement on the desirability of the feature 

Yes, absolutely desirable.

> and b) that there is broad 
> agreement on the general design (i.e. to use a circular buffer in shared 
> memory, of configurable size, to hold the outstanding message queue). 

Would it spill out to disk and expand (and shrink again) as required? 
Loss of notifications should not occur imho.

Regards, Dave.