On 3/21/2007 1:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>> On 3/20/2007 1:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> search_path
>>> add_missing_from
>>> transform_null_equals
>>> sql_inheritance
>
>> Don't we actually store the parsetree in the query cache, and doesn't
>> that actually make a lot of the above rather NOT affect the resulting
>> plan any more?
>
> No, what the code now does is to store the raw grammar output --- a
> replan includes a fresh pass through parse_analyze. This must happen
> if we want the thing to cope with dropping and replacing temp tables,
> which is one of the main use-cases ...
Ah, yes, that makes more cents now.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #