Re: Adding an explaining title to Notes on SGML
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Adding an explaining title to Notes on SGML |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 45fdd7f7-83d6-4208-8ec1-a65e224b8514@eisentraut.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Adding an explaining title to Notes on SGML (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23.04.26 15:33, Marcos Pegoraro wrote: > Em qui., 23 de abr. de 2026 às 09:27, David G. Johnston > <david.g.johnston@gmail.com <mailto:david.g.johnston@gmail.com>> escreveu: > > Use a footnote, but add entries for any/some to the table and > use the description to say they are not implemented and to use > bool_and/bool_or instead, then anchor the footnote at these entries. > > > Honestly, I'd like to remove all footnotes. The watermark identifying > them is so small that many people don't even see that it's a link, and > the fact that it's at the bottom of the page makes it even more isolated > from the text it refers to. > Another thing I've been thinking about is the "see below". Because it > doesn't have a link and in some cases is placed within a large > paragraph, that "see below" appears very far away, and the user also > doesn't know how to find it. I agree, new footnotes should be avoided.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: