Re: Indexam interface proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Teodor Sigaev
Тема Re: Indexam interface proposal
Дата
Msg-id 45FE92E4.8020201@sigaev.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Indexam interface proposal  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Indexam interface proposal  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Indexam interface proposal  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Right, except that flag is per operator in operator class, and what I'm 
> proposing is that the index could pass a flag per tuple in the scan. 

That might make sense even for GiST. Sometimes complex compressions is used in 
GiST opclasses. If indexing value is rather small then it's stored in index as 
is, but large value is compressed with lossy techniques. So, GiST might return a 
tuple which is allowed to not recheck.
-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures