Re: HOT - whats next ?

Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> The main point is to get a set of functions that can be used directly in
> additional regression tests as well as diagnostics. ISTM we need to
> *prove* HOT works, not just claim it. I'm very open to different
> approaches as to how we might do this.
>
>   

Functions to support regression tests don't need to be built-ins. We 
already load some extra stuff for regression tests.

cheers

andrew