Re: [BUGS] BUG #2977: dow doesn't conform to ISO-8601

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Updated version applied.  I reduced the numering changes for the macros.
>
> There was also documentation text for "dow" and a few others that said
> "(for <type>timestamp</type> values only)", but in fact the field worked
> for "timestamptz" and "date" too, so I removed the mentions.  If people
> get confused, I will come up with new wording, like "doesn't work for
> interval or time", which I think is pretty obvious.  I remember people
> got confused in the past about this, so maybe we still need something.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I have implemented 'isodow' with the attached patch.

Thanks for the patch and the new function.

Adriaan van Os