Re: pgsql: Adjust user-facing documentation to explain why we don't check

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: pgsql: Adjust user-facing documentation to explain why we don't check
Дата
Msg-id 45DB5307.3020204@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgsql: Adjust user-facing documentation to explain why we don't check  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: pgsql: Adjust user-facing documentation to explain why we don't check  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-committers
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> It would break insofar that it wouldn't work. the pgpass file. It will
> of course not break *windows*, but people will consider PostgreSQL broken.
>

Please explain why it won't work. *Existing* pgpass files would need to
be secured, but that could be handled with documentation and suitable
checks and hints in pgAdmin/libpq. New pgpass files created by pgAdmin
(or other apps) would simply need to be secured by those apps at
creation time.

/D

В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian)
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql: Update "encode" documentation to mention that 'escape' only
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Adjust user-facing documentation to explain why we don't check