Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribió:
>
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew Dunstan escribi?:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Looks to me like the timestamptz test relies on the timestamp test (for
>>>> timestamp_tbl) but they are set to run in parallel, so we have a race
>>>> condition. Oops!
>>>>
>>> Good catch :-)
>>>
>>> I'd guess the answer is to move the tests using the timestamp_tbl to the
>>> timestamp test.
>>>
>> OK, will do.  Thanks for the diagnosis.
>>
>
> Actually I have a patch ready for it.
>
>

Well, the first question is "which table should these tests actually be
using, and why?" Then they can be changed or moved as appropriate.

cheers

andrew