On Jun27, 2012, at 07:18 , Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> The problem is the way to implement it.
> If we would have permission checks on planner stage, it cannot handle
> a case when user-id would be switched prior to executor stage, thus
> it needs something remedy to handle the scenario correctly.
> Instead of a unique plan per query, it might be a solution to generate
> multiple plans depending on user-id, and choose a proper one in
> executor stage.
>
> Which type of implementation is what everybody is asking for?
I think you need to
a) Determine the user-id at planning time, and insert the matching RLS clause
b1) Either re-plan the query if the user-id changes between planning and execution time, which means making the
user-ida part of the plan-cache key.
b2) Or decree that for RLS purposes, it's the user-id at planning time, not execution time, that counts.
best regards,
Florian Pflug