Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>>> we have several requests to improve ltree, particularly, people want
>>> to expand class of allowed symbols and configurable separator, which is
>>> hard-coded right now. Also, we discussed GiN support for ltree.
>
>> O.k. but how does that prevent it from being in core?
>
> Once it's in core the expectations for API stability get a lot higher ...
True but any API can be backward compatible for say a release while
offering the new functionality as well. I fully understand stability in
core. I certainly don't want any level of instability, even if just
syntactic.
Maybe there isn't a good answer.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/