Re: [HACKERS] how to plan for vacuum?
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] how to plan for vacuum? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 45B8D521.8010405@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: how to plan for vacuum? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] how to plan for vacuum?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
>> I'll generally start with a cost delay of 20ms and adjust based on IO
>> utilization.
>
> I've been considering set a default autovacuum cost delay to 10ms; does
> this sound reasonable?
It really depends on the system. Most of our systems run anywhere from
10-25ms. I find that any more than that, Vacuum takes too long.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: