Jeremy Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> I still haven't heard any argument for why this would be necessary or
>> desirable at all, other than that it looks better for marketing
>> reasons, which I will counter by saying that it looks worse for
>> marketing reasons because our hailed plugin mechanism is apparently so
>> poor that it can't support some practical extension module such as
>> this.
>>
>
> I for one am greatly looking forward to tsearch2 being in core.
>
>
For goodness' sake! This is work that's been sponsored! Are we going to
turn around now and reject it? We'd be a laughing stock.
cheers
andrew