Re: ideas for auto-processing patches

markwkm@gmail.com schrieb:
> On 1/4/07, Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
...
>> Pulling branches from
>> anonvcvs regularly might be burdensome bandwidth-wise. So, like you 
>> say, a
>> local mirror would be beneficial for patch testing.
> 
> Right some sort of local mirror would definitely speed things up.

Easier speedup in this regard would be using subversion instead
of cvs. It transfers only diffs to your working copy (or rather,
to your last checkout) so its really saving on bandwidth.

Regards
Tino