Re: CATUPDATE confusion?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4593.1425706263@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CATUPDATE confusion?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 12/29/14 7:16 PM, Adam Brightwell wrote:
>> Given this discussion, I have attached a patch that removes CATUPDATE
>> for review/discussion.
> committed this version
Hmm .. I'm not sure that summarily removing usecatupd from those three
system views was well thought out. pg_shadow, especially, has no reason
to live at all except for backwards compatibility, and clients might well
expect that column to still be there. I wonder if we'd not be better off
to keep the column in the views but have it read from rolsuper.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: