-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
David Blewett wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, I have no idea what it'll take to get this patch propagated
>> into the copies people actually use, so your fix sounds good for the
>> short term.
>
>> regards, tom lane
>
>
> I submitted the patch to gentoo's bugzilla:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158605
>
> David Blewett
>
Hi Tom:
There's been a question posted to that bug. Would you mind replying
to it? You don't have to create an account there. I can post your reply.
David
Quoted, leonardop@gentoo.org:
"Very interesting. I'd of course love to add a patch like this,
however, it seems not so easy to follow. Not that the patch itself
is overly complicated, but openjade sources are, let's say, less
than ideal.
If you or the original author of the patch could comment the
changes, specially those in style/primitive.cxx regarding to the
protect and protect2 objects, it would help a lot.
Also, for future reference, please create your patches as unified
diffs when submitting them to resources such as this bugzilla (many
other projects encourage this as well).
Thanks."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFi7W0Zmlc6wNjtLYRCBUPAJ0X2y99yxnFsike34Vo+JHckPcI6wCfVzdc
HuCmC6It6UvVa6a/5Z1QuGU=
=fJ3G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----