Magnus Hagander wrote:
> We need different macrosand possibly functions, yes.
> I think I got enough patched at home last night to get it working with
> this, I was just too focused on one set of macros at the time. It's not
> enough to include them very late - because off_t is used in the shared
> datastructures in pg_dump/etc. It is possible to localise it to the
> pg_dump binaries, though, given some header redirection *and* given that
> we change all those off_t to pgoff_t (or similar). I couldn't find a way
> to do it without changing the off_t define.
>
> I'll try to take a look at merging these two efforts (again unless
> beaten to it, have to do some of that dreaded christmas shopping as
> well...)
>
>
>
What is needed to test this? Just a custom dump file with a member >
2^31 bytes?
cheers
andrew