Joachim Wieland wrote:
>Yes, I completely agree that JDT should not be included. I just wanted to
>understand how those lines show that JST is still in active use. As far as I
>understand it, it says that JST was observed from 1948 to 1951 (the second
>rule) and now there is a time zone "J%sT" (because there is no "until"-date
>in the last line) but there is no rule that tells us what to replace "%s"
>with...
>
>
We're using JST as a time zone here, so I'd like to politely request
that JST stay in the list of time zones, wether it is an "official" time
zone or not. Thanks.
Brian