Re: b-tree index performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ron Johnson
Тема Re: b-tree index performance
Дата
Msg-id 4582A6B0.8000604@cox.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: b-tree index performance  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Ответы Re: b-tree index performance  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/15/06 05:41, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:13:00PM +0200, Yonatan Ben-Nes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering does the b-tree index performance change when it's
>> implemented on different data types fields? is it better to use one of them
>> instead of the other for (=) comparisons?
>> I'm especially interested between INT8 and TEXT data types.
>
> The difference in performence will be determined by the cost of
> comparison. The cost of comparing strings is much higher than for
> integers, so it will be slower.

And comparing INT8 is more expensive on a 32-bit system.

Since TEXT is totally variable, is there a big difference in TEXT vs
CHAR(8)?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFgqawS9HxQb37XmcRAte5AKC984ov7nwW9XfDHGU/75tfmNkeFQCfdrD8
2O8Ia4/Luo3RbVsIW1ImBx4=
=E2uZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Mitchell
Дата:
Сообщение: free space?
Следующее
От: Henrik Zagerholm
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Needed files - embedded postgres