Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> That'd leave only Cygwin with HAVE BUGGY_STRTOF.  Perhaps they have
> fixed their implementation[1]?  Here's an experimental patch to drop
> all remnants, which could be used to find out.  No Windows/Cygwin
> here.  Hmm, what if we just commit it anyway?  If their strtof() is
> still broken and someone out there is running the tests and sees this
> test fail, why shouldn't they take that up with libc at this stage?

Hmm, we could get rid of the whole resultmap mechanism ...

            regards, tom lane