Re: 8.2rc1 (much) slower than 8.2dev?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Arjen van der Meijden
Тема Re: 8.2rc1 (much) slower than 8.2dev?
Дата
Msg-id 4577DB2D.6090205@tweakers.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 8.2rc1 (much) slower than 8.2dev?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Ответы Re: 8.2rc1 (much) slower than 8.2dev?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
On 7-12-2006 7:01 Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Can you post them on the web somewhere so everyone can look at them?
No, its not (only) the size that matters, its the confidentiality I'm
not allowed to just break by myself. Well, at least not on a scale like
that. I've been mailing off-list with Tom and we found at least one
query that in some circumstances takes a lot more time than it should,
due to it mistakenly chosing to do a bitmap index scan rather than a
normal index scan.

> Also, are you looking at EXPLAIN or EXPLAIN ANALYZE?
Explain analyze and normal query execution times of several millions of
queries executed on both versions of postgresql, so we can say something
about them statistically.

Best regards,

Arjen

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brian Wipf
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Areca 1260 Performance
Следующее
От: "Mindaugas"
Дата:
Сообщение: Core 2 or Opteron