Re: old synchronized scan patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Florian G. Pflug
Тема Re: old synchronized scan patch
Дата
Msg-id 4575881C.60206@phlo.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: old synchronized scan patch  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
Ответы Re: old synchronized scan patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: old synchronized scan patch  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> The worst that can happen, is a hash collision, in which case you lose
> the benefits of sync scans, but you wont degrade compared to non-sync
> scans

But it could cause "mysterious" performance regressions, no?
Image that your app includes two large tables, which are both
scannen frequently. Suppose that synchronous scanning gives this
use-case a noticeable performance boost. Now, you dump and reload
your schema, and suddently the hashes of oids of those tables
collide. You percieve a noticeable drop in performance that you
can neither explain nor fix without a rather deep understanding
of postgres internals.

greetings, Florian Pflug



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Weak passwords and brute force attacks
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Bundle of patches