Re: Count(*) Question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Count(*) Question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4566.1020224347@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Count(*) Question ("Peter Darley" <pdarley@kinesis-cem.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Peter Darley" <pdarley@kinesis-cem.com> writes:
> I was reading through the Rules section of the online docs, and noticed the
> following note: (* is just an abbreviation for all the attribute names of a
> relation. It is expanded by the parser into the individual attributes, so
> the rule system never sees it.)
> Does this mean that count(*) may return less than the total number of
> records if all the fields in a record are NULL?
No. "SELECT * FROM" means "select all the fields available from the
FROM tables", and "SELECT foo.* FROM ..., foo, ..." means "select
all the fields available from table foo, given the other constraints
of the query". But "SELECT count(*) FROM ..." means "count all the
records produced by this FROM-expression", as opposed to "SELECT
count(some-value) FROM ..." which means "count how many records yield
a non-null result for `some-value' in this FROM-expression".
The SQL spec writers blew it by using * to mean two different things.
PG actually translates COUNT(*) into COUNT(1). Since 1 is never
NULL, this produces the correct result per spec. COUNT(0), or
COUNT(any-guaranteed-not-null-expression), would produce the same
answer.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: