Re: Request for replication advice
| От | Shane Ambler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Request for replication advice |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4555370A.5030506@007Marketing.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Request for replication advice ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Brendan Jurd wrote: > Why *does* Slony require a bi-directional connection to the > subscriber? The data is travelling in one direction only ... what > needs to come back the other way? So the slave can say "yes I got that data you can remove it from my TODO list" ? > This seems to be getting rather messy. I wonder if I might not be > better off just writing AFTER triggers on all the tables I'm > interested in, which replicate the query to the slave system with > psql. It would probably be relatively labour intensive, and increase > the burden of administering the schema, but it would also be a much > more direct and simple approach. > That sounds like contrib/dbmirror -- Shane Ambler pgSQL@007Marketing.com Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: