Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview of HOTUpdates
| От | Nikhil S |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview of HOTUpdates |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4554768B.4070700@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview of HOTUpdates ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,> True, but Nikhil has run tests that clearly show HOT outperforming> current situation in the case of long running transactions.The need to> optimise HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() and avoid long chains does still> remain a difficulty for bothHOT and the current situation.> Yes, I carried out some pgbench runs comparing our current HOT update patch with PG82BETA2 sources for the long running transaction case. For an apples to apples comparison we got roughly 170% improvement with the HOT update patch over BETA2. In case of BETA2, since all versions are in the main heap, we end up doing multiple index scans for them. In case of HOT updates, we have a single index entry with the chains getting traversed from the overflow relation. So as Simon has mentioned the need to avoid long chains remains a difficulty for both the situations. Regards, Nikhils
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: