Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Florian G. Pflug
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Дата
Msg-id 454B7E5D.5030704@phlo.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug in WAL backup documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> writes:
> Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained about
> it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd".  I'm inclined to go
> with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs to match the code, but does
> anyone have a contrary opinion?

I think supplying the absolute path makes archiving scripts less
error-prone, which is a good time. So I'd vote for absolute paths.

greetings, Florian Pflug

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Следующее
От: "Simon Riggs"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation