> I really think that actual decisions about spending money have to be based
> on "bang for the buck." Now, if you were to day "bang for the buck being
> equal, we should prioritize things this way ..." I might agree with you
> (probably not, though ... I have a low opinion of memberships).
I pretty much have zero desire to spend money on *any* memberships.
Frankly, the only way I would even consider it would be if a company
like OTG or CMD made a donation specifically for the purchase of a
membership.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate