Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 452FCEE0.9010604@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> "running PostgreSQL" != "running mission-critical public services on
> PostgreSQL". :)
>
> AFAIK every large customer we've talked to is "running" MySQL... for
> internal apps that aren't mission-critical.
Well any company will to run mysql for mission critical stuff probably
isn't thinking very hard about the implications.
Beyond that, I know of several *technical* based fortune 500 companies
that are doing exactly that... running postgresql on critical
infrastructure. No. I will not name names, don't ask.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: