>> Not only that, but I think the very last answer really hit the nail
>> on the head when it comes to MySQL and PostgreSQL: there's no need
>> to take MySQL's trade-offs for even your light-weight applications.
>
> True.
>
>> The reality is, very few companies are willing to bet their a..erm,
>> donkey ;) on PostgreSQL... yet.
>
> I think this was true two years ago, but just about anybody here can
> name a whole bunch of outfits (and probably is not allowed to name
> others) that bet the farm on PostgreSQL. :)
Shhhhhhhhhhhhh! You will get me in trouble.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate