Re: Simple join optimized badly?
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Simple join optimized badly? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 452BACE2.5010700@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Simple join optimized badly? ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:41:09PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> One of the big problems with doing set enable_...=off is that there's no
>>> way to embed that into something like a view, so you're almost forced
>>> into putting into the application code itself, which makes matters even
>>> worse. If you could hint this within a query (maybe even on a per-table
>>> level), you could at least encapsulate that into a view.
>> You can easily pass multiple statements within a single exec() or push
>> it into an SPF.
>
> Unless I'm missing something, putting multiple statements in a single
> exec means you're messing with the application code. And you can't
> update a SRF (also means messing with the application code). Though, I
> suppose you could update a view that pulled from an SRF...
I always think of application code as outside the db. I was thinking
more in layers.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: